Consider
Statement-$1$: $(p \wedge \sim q) \wedge (\sim p \wedge q)$ is a fallacy.
Statement-$2$: $(p \rightarrow q) \leftrightarrow (\sim q \rightarrow \sim p)$ is a tautology.

  • A
    Statement-$1$ is false,Statement-$2$ is true
  • B
    Statement-$1$ is true,Statement-$2$ is false
  • C
    Statement-$1$ is true,Statement-$2$ is true; Statement-$2$ is a correct explanation for Statement-$1$
  • D
    Statement-$1$ is true,Statement-$2$ is true; Statement-$2$ is not a correct explanation for Statement-$1$

Explore More

Similar Questions

Write the negation of the following statement and check whether the resulting statement is true:
Every natural number is greater than $0.$

The statement $(P$ $\Rightarrow Q) \wedge (R$ $\Rightarrow Q)$ is logically equivalent to:

The statement that is $TRUE$ among the following is:

The negation of the Boolean expression $p \vee (\sim p \wedge q)$ is equivalent to

If $p$: switch $s_1$ is closed,$q$: switch $s_2$ is closed,then the correct interpretation of the following circuit is:

Vedclass Products

For Students

Vedclass Test Series

Mock tests in real JEE/NEET style with performance analysis. 5-day free trial.

Start Free Trial
For Teachers

Exam Paper Generator

Generate Set A/B/C/D exam papers from 7.5L+ questions in 2 minutes. 3 chapters free.

Try Free
For Institutes

Online Exam Module

Live online exams with unlimited students, 360° analytics & white-label branding.

See Demo